April 17 2008

Robert will give a money back guarantee on any site he detects where he says that there are specified (defined) values and it ever turns out that there are not.

However this guarantee will only be valid if the client will have three assays done with certified competent assayers under Roberts’s directions. Robert will also have to be there and take the samples personally and mail them out, at the clients cost paid for in advance, including Roberts’s expenses and professional labor cost.

I have been doing noble metal assay work (gold, platinum & silver) for many years now and well know that the majority of the assays (for noble metals) that are done here in the USA are not accurately definitive in many cases, therefore I reserve the right to so direct the clients to the proper professionals. Robert, as well as other professional metallurgists have sent test samples to various assay labs to find that many of their assays are way off on the amount of the actual values and in some cases they only detect traces of values when there are much more.

In controlled test cases I have even added one gram of gold to a one/ton assay and it came back from the assayer at 12 ounces of Au per ton. With a gram of gold added, it should have come back a thousand ounces of gold per ton on top of what was already there!

There are many reasons why assays can come out inaccurate and this has to do with the complex chemical matrix of some ore. It is too lengthy of a subject for me to elaborate on here and now. Any one that wants to know can spend a lot of time and expense doing so if they wish.

The Jericho Detection Machine will not do assays, but it will detect elements where they are and reveal the strongest or most dense element out of the other less dense deposits. Much of the time I can define a solid target from meager vain, but good placer gold is often difficult to separate and define from a solid bar of gold. All of this is of course is relative in that there are many variables, that is for example, I did a sight one time that had a rather large body of rich gold ore and the strength of that target was so strong that I was beginning to wonder if there was not a solid gold target underneath it.

Another example; I found a target last year that read very strong and the ore body that is there is so rich that it will set off a good metal detector on discrimination mode all over the target area for several hundred feet in every direction. At this point I certainly cannot define a solid target, especially if there is a solid target underneath that kind of turf. On the other hand one of my tests revealed that I can measure and do a relative strength read e.g. in one canyon valley I found approximately 12 deposits of gold ore and marked them well, then I did an adjustment on the Jericho Machine and then I was able to find the largest or richest of the 12 targets and on down to the least. These were all sampled and assayed and the relative read strengths were all measured and compared to the assays. This is why I am certain about my work.

In cases of Archeology or Treasure sites, such as sunken ships where some of the contents is known then it makes for a much better chance of defining a target, because we can (cross reference) detect for various elements like Emeralds, Gold, Silver, Bronze, Iron and Brass. We can also define and map out the area and location of these different elements. In a debris field where there are scattered coins and various other small metallic objects we can also find and isolate the larger of these. In the event that someone has a very specialized peculiar element compound and has a list of the elements in this compound and or a sample of it, then we can do a frequency chart on it and proceed to search for and find it.

To be continued.

Sincerely, Robert